|
May
16
|
Posted by Charger_Girl
May 16, 2008 |
|
Bill Belichick responded to the latest update about the whole Spygate situation by stating that Matt Walsh was “a low-level staffer who was fired for ‘poor job performance.’” Adding, “There’s not a lot of credibility … You know, he’s tried to make it seem like we’re buddies, and belong to the same book club and all. That’s really a long, long stretch.” Hmm, Belichick claiming to know the meaning of the word credibility….quite humorous, if you ask me.
To continue, in an HBO interview with Bryant Gumbel, Walsh “dismissed Belichick’s attempts to minimize the impact of the taping. Walsh told HBO he was coached on how to evade NFL rules, and that team officials instructed him on ways to avoid detection.”
“When I was doing it, I understood what we were doing to be wrong,” Walsh said. “Coach Belichick’s explanation for having misinterpreted the rules, to me, that really didn’t sound like taking responsibility for what we had done, especially considering the great lengths that we had gone through to hide what we were doing.”
Belichick denied telling Walsh to hide what he was doing.
To compound the matter, Roger Goodell has offered an ambiguity to his previous statements as well. “I didn’t accept Bill Belichick’s explanation for what happened,” Goodell said Tuesday, “and I still don’t to this day.” If this were true, Mr. Goodell, then why the expedient destruction of evidence? That sure wasn’t the actions of a skeptic, now, was it??

(Look in the dictionary under ‘unscrupulous’, ‘non-credible’, and ‘untrustworthy’ and this is what you will see.)
(Source: nfl.com)
Comments
Hello, I hate to plug this on here, but we have started a Web site that you may interested in at www.impeachgoodell.com.